Before I say anything, I simply need to say that the Utah Utes are my school football public bosses for the 2008 season. Why? Since school football is stuck in a bygone custom in which the public hero is chosen by a survey each year. In the event that the AP electors will pick their public hero, for what reason wouldn’t i be able to pick mine?
What we as a whole know, however, is that the postseason of school football is long past due for a change. Indeed, a few years, as in 2002, the BCS was useful. However, in different years, as 2008, the BCS was a finished wreck. Why? Since it is intrinsically imperfect. The BCS is intended to coordinate with the two best groups from the customary season in a title game. That is okay when in 2002 Ohio State and Miami(FL) were the solitary undefeated groups.
Yet, shouldn’t something be said about this year? Utah and Boise state completed the standard season undefeated. Oklahoma, Texas, Texas Tech, USC, Florida, Alabama and Penn State all got done with one misfortune. How on earth can the BCS guarantee to “know” which of those groups are the two best? All of them presented a decent defense to be given thought.
So with the prospect of a school football season finisher not in the plan of the BCS, how can be dealt with fix this wreck? The appropriate response is an in addition to one arrangement.
Presently, the BCS matches the two best groups toward the finish of the ordinary season. An in addition to one configuration thinks about the bowl season prior to choosing who the two best groups in the country are. Envision this year if the dishes had been Florida beating Texas, Oklahoma squeaking past Ohio State and Utah destroying Alabama? Wouldn’t the bowl prepare have presented the defense for Utah to play Florida in the title game? Envision a public title where the two groups accomplished something beyond win the apparent “best” meetings in school football?
So here is a postseason proposition for school football that can really work. To start with, add a fifth bowl to the BCS bowls. The Cotton Bowl appears to be a conspicuous decision. แนะนําบอลสเต็ป Then, at that point, make a customary contention between meeting champions. The accompanying could work:
Rose Bowl: Pac 10 versus Big 10
Party Bowl: Big 12 versus WAC
Sugar Bowl: SEC versus MWC
Orange Bowl: ACC versus Big East
Cotton Bowl: C-USA, Sun Belt, MAC
The two higher positioned groups between C-USA, Sun Belt and MAC can play in the Cotton Bowl. Notre Dame gets in the Cotton Bowl in the event that they are positioned #8 or higher and are additionally positioned higher than no less than two of those gathering champions.
Presently these dishes will all be played in two days to bring back some New Year’s custom. Two dishes are played on December 31 and the other three on January 1. Change as needs be on the off chance that one of those falls on a Sunday. Make these BCS bowls the last dishes played of the period. When all dishes have been played, including these BCS bowls, then, at that point the BCS reranks the groups.
The in addition to one configuration would require the new number one and number two to play each other in the public title game. Is it great? No, in light of the fact that there will consistently be debate. In any case, does anybody at any point check out a bowl game their group isn’t playing in? This would bring the significance of the school football ordinary season into the bowl season. Losing a bowl game would be something other than a mistake like it is presently; it could crash your public title goals.
A season finisher is the lone genuine approach to dispose of contention in this game, however we as a whole know the BCS and the people pulling the strings won’t permit that to happen at any point in the near future. That is, obviously, except if Obama and the public authority mediate and stop the unreasonable acts of the BCS. I wouldn’t pause your breathing however. Until a season finisher can turn into a reality, this in addition to one proposition would be all that we could get.